
CMP 40HX

Radeon Pro W5500
CMP 40HX vs Radeon Pro W5500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
CMP 40HX vs Radeon Pro W5500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
CMP 40HX vs Radeon Pro W5500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌75.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌48% higher power demand at 185W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 78.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.3 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 185W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
CMP 40HX vs Radeon Pro W5500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon Pro W5500
The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Radeon Pro W5500 reaches 8,913 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro W5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1400 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 8,913+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+64% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS+93% | 3.942 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+18% | 1400 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+64% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro W5500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the CMP 40HX and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5500. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500). Decoder: No vs VCN 2.0.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | No | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon Pro W5500's 125W — a 38.7% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 125W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 71.3+51% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the CMP 40HX came in at $699, while the Radeon Pro W5500 launched at $399. On MSRP, Radeon Pro W5500 was 42.9% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 22.3 (Radeon Pro W5500) — the Radeon Pro W5500 offers 78.4% better value. The newer card here is CMP 40HX (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $399-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 22.3+78% |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 14 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #302 | #294 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















