CPU
GPU
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The CMP 40HX is positioned at rank #119 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar CMP 40HX
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The CMP 40HX uses modern memory architecture. The CMP 40HX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 480 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The CMP 40HX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 480 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 480 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $55 versus $120 for the CMP 40HX, it costs 54% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 113.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+113.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) | ✅More affordable ($55) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and Radeon RX 480
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.
Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Radeon RX 480 reaches 8,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1266 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749+2% | 8,546 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS+30% | 5.834 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+30% | 1266 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+311% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 480 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 480 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: No vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | No | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 20.9% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 150W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 57.0+21% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229 and now averages $55. The Radeon RX 480 costs 54.2% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.9 (CMP 40HX) vs 155.4 (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 113.2% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $229-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $55-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 72.9 | 155.4+113% |
| Codename | TU106 | Ellesmere |
| Release | February 25 2021 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #302 | #305 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on CMP 40HX and Radeon RX 480
