
CMP 40HX

Radeon RX 480
CMP 40HX vs Radeon RX 480 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
CMP 40HX vs Radeon RX 480 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
CMP 40HX vs Radeon RX 480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌205.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌23.3% higher power demand at 185W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 198.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 185W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
CMP 40HX vs Radeon RX 480 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Radeon RX 480 reaches 8,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1266 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749+2% | 8,546 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS+30% | 5.834 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+30% | 1266 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+311% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 480 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 480 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the CMP 40HX and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 480. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: No vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | No | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 20.9% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 150W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 57.0+21% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the CMP 40HX came in at $699, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. On MSRP, Radeon RX 480 was 67.2% cheaper ($470 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 198.4% better value. The newer card here is CMP 40HX (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $229-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 37.3+198% |
| Codename | TU106 | Ellesmere |
| Release | February 25 2021 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #302 | #305 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















