
CMP 40HX

Radeon R9 390
CMP 40HX vs Radeon R9 390 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
CMP 40HX vs Radeon R9 390 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
CMP 40HX vs Radeon R9 390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 300W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 275mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌112.5% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 26.9 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Radeon R9 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.9 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌62.2% higher power demand at 300W vs 185W.
- ❌20.1% longer card at 275mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
CMP 40HX vs Radeon R9 390 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon R9 390
The Radeon R9 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,855 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Radeon R9 390 reaches 8,855 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 390). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 8,855+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS+48% | 5.12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+65% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+265% | 0.63 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 390 carries 8 GB. Radeon R9 390 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the CMP 40HX and 512-bit on the Radeon R9 390. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 390) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 390). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390). Decoder: No vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | No | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon R9 390's 300W — a 47.4% difference. The CMP 40HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W-38% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 275mm |
| Height | 111mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-16% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3+60% | 29.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the CMP 40HX came in at $699, while the Radeon R9 390 launched at $329. On MSRP, Radeon R9 390 was 52.9% cheaper ($370 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 26.9 (Radeon R9 390) — the Radeon R9 390 offers 115.2% better value. The newer card here is CMP 40HX (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $329-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 26.9+115% |
| Codename | TU106 | Grenada |
| Release | February 25 2021 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #302 | #296 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















