
CMP 40HX

Radeon R9 295X2
CMP 40HX vs Radeon R9 295X2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
CMP 40HX vs Radeon R9 295X2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
CMP 40HX vs Radeon R9 295X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 114.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 500W, a 315W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 307mm, a 78mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon R9 295X2
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌114.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌170.3% higher power demand at 500W vs 185W.
- ❌34.1% longer card at 307mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
CMP 40HX vs Radeon R9 295X2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Radeon R9 295X2 reaches 8,734 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 295X2 uses GCN 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1018 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 8,734 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2816 ×2+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS+33% | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+62% | 1018 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 144 | 176 ×2+22% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+233% | 0.69 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 295X2 carries 8 GB. Radeon R9 295X2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the CMP 40HX and 512-bit x2 on the Radeon R9 295X2. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit x2+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Decoder: No vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | No | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 500W — a 92% difference. The CMP 40HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 307mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W-63% | 500W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-50% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 307mm |
| Height | 111mm | 114mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3+170% | 17.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the CMP 40HX came in at $699, while the Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499. On MSRP, CMP 40HX was 53.4% cheaper ($800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 295X2) — the CMP 40HX offers 115.5% better value. The newer card here is CMP 40HX (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-53% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5+116% | 5.8 |
| Codename | TU106 | Vesuvius |
| Release | February 25 2021 | April 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #302 | #303 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















