G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Quadro P3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Quadro P3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

2014

Why buy it

✅13.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
499.8% HIGHER MSRP
$2,999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 375W vs 75W.

Quadro P3200

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 483.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅GeForce GTX TITAN Z is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P3200 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 375W, a 300W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN Z across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (8,811 vs 8,578), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P3200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P3200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,499 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $2,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 483.9% (17.2 vs 2.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX TITAN Z still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Quadro P3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

Quadro P3200

The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the Quadro P3200 reaches 8,578 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the Quadro P3200 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1543 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Quadro P3200
G3D Mark Score	8,811+3%	8,578
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	5760 ×2+221%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.046 TFLOPS ×2	5.53 TFLOPS+10%
Boost Clock	876 MHz	1543 MHz+76%
ROPs	48 ×2	64+33%
TMUs	240 ×2+114%	112
L1 Cache	240 KB	672 KB+180%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P3200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Quadro P3200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN Z gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX TITAN Z and 256-bit on the Quadro P3200.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Quadro P3200
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	384-bit x2+50%	256-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12 (Quadro P3200). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Quadro P3200
DirectX	12	12
Vulkan	1.0	1.3+30%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200).

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Quadro P3200
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.265,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the Quadro P3200's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 500W (Quadro P3200). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Quadro P3200
TDP	375W	75W-80%
Recommended PSU	700W	500W-29%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	3	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80
Perf/Watt	23.5	114.4+387%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z came in at $2999, while the Quadro P3200 launched at $500. On MSRP, Quadro P3200 was 83.3% cheaper ($2499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 17.2 (Quadro P3200) — the Quadro P3200 offers 493.1% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P3200 (2018 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Quadro P3200
MSRP	$2999	$500-83%
Performance per Dollar	2.9	17.2+493%
Codename	GK110B	GP104
Release	May 28 2014	February 21 2018
Ranking	#300	#304

Search GeForce GTX TITAN Z on Amazon

Search Quadro P3200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.