
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Tesla P4

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:

Tesla P4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla P4
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla P4 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla P4 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla P4 holds the technical lead. Priced at $190 (vs $400), it costs 53% less, resulting in a 115.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+115.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($190) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Tesla P4

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

Tesla P4
The Tesla P4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 886 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,004 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the Tesla P4 reaches 9,004 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the Tesla P4 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2,560 (Tesla P4). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 5.704 TFLOPS (Tesla P4). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811 | 9,004+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2+125% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 5.704 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1114 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+50% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 960 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P4 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2 MB (Tesla P4) — the Tesla P4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.1 (Tesla P4). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.4+40% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs NVENC 6.0 (Tesla P4). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Tesla P4).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the Tesla P4's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Tesla P4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 500W (Tesla P4). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 168mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 75W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 53mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 120.1+411% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the Tesla P4 launched at $1000 and now averages $190. The Tesla P4 costs 52.5% less ($210 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 47.4 (Tesla P4) — the Tesla P4 offers 115.5% better value. The Tesla P4 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $1000-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $190-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0 | 47.4+115% |
| Codename | GK110B | GP104 |
| Release | May 28 2014 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #300 | #293 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















