G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 212.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 250W instead of 375W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN Z across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

2014

Why buy it

✅7.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
200.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,999 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 375W vs 250W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX TITAN Black instead at 9,177 vs 8,811, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX TITAN Black is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX TITAN Black makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,000 cheaper on MSRP at $999 vs $2,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 212.7% (9.2 vs 2.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX TITAN Z still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 and the GeForce GTX TITAN Z reaches 8,811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 876 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
G3D Mark Score	9,177+4%	8,811
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2880	5760 ×2+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.645 TFLOPS+12%	5.046 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	980 MHz+12%	876 MHz
ROPs	48	48 ×2
TMUs	240	240 ×2
L1 Cache	240 KB	240 KB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z carries 12 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN Z gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — a 900.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN Black and 384-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX TITAN Z.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	12 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s	336 GB/s x2
Bus Width	384-bit	384-bit x2
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
DirectX	12.0	12
Vulkan	1.2+20%	1.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z).

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Encoder	NVENC 1.0	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	NVDEC 1st gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Z's 375W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
TDP	250W-33%	375W
Recommended PSU	600W-14%	700W
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	36.7+56%	23.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black came in at $999, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX TITAN Black was 66.7% cheaper ($2000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers 217.2% better value.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
MSRP	$999-67%	$2999
Performance per Dollar	9.2+217%	2.9
Codename	GK110B	GK110B
Release	February 18 2014	May 28 2014
Ranking	#288	#300

Search GeForce GTX TITAN Black on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX TITAN Z on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.