
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 212.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 375W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 375W vs 250W.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 212.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 375W, a 125W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 375W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX TITAN Black better than GeForce GTX TITAN Z?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX TITAN Z still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 99 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 53 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Black and GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX TITAN Black
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 and the GeForce GTX TITAN Z reaches 8,811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,177+4% | 8,811 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880 | 5760 ×2+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.645 TFLOPS+12% | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz+12% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 ×2 |
| TMUs | 240 | 240 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has 12 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — a 900.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit x2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 336 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit x2 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+20% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Z's 375W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-33% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-14% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7+56% | 23.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black launched at $999 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black costs 66.7% less ($2000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers 217.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-67% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2+217% | 2.9 |
| Codename | GK110B | GK110B |
| Release | February 18 2014 | May 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #288 | #300 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













