
GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Radeon RX 580
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon RX 580 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon RX 580 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon RX 580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1209.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 38.4 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅1.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,770 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1207.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅GeForce GTX TITAN Z is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon RX 580 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon RX 580 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

Radeon RX 580
The Radeon RX 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,799 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the Radeon RX 580 reaches 8,799 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1340 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811 | 8,799 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2+150% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 6.175 TFLOPS+22% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1340 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+67% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 576 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 580 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX TITAN Z gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 580 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 580 carries 8 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN Z gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 580) — a 1213.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Memory bus width is 384-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX TITAN Z and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 580. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 580) — the Radeon RX 580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s x2+31% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12 (Radeon RX 580). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX 580). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 580).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the Radeon RX 580's 185W — a 67.9% difference. The Radeon RX 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 500W (Radeon RX 580). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 185W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 47.6+103% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z came in at $2999, while the Radeon RX 580 launched at $229. On MSRP, Radeon RX 580 was 92.4% cheaper ($2770 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 38.4 (Radeon RX 580) — the Radeon RX 580 offers 1224.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 580 (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $229-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 38.4+1224% |
| Codename | GK110B | Polaris 20 |
| Release | May 28 2014 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #300 | #301 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















