GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Radeon R9 295X2
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon R9 295X2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon R9 295X2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon R9 295X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 375W instead of 500W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 307mm, a 40mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 295X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌100.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$1,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Radeon R9 295X2
2014Why buy it
- ✅2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 500W vs 375W.
- ❌15% longer card at 307mm vs 267mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon R9 295X2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the Radeon R9 295X2 reaches 8,734 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 295X2 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1018 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811 | 8,734 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2+105% | 2816 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2+14% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1018 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 64 ×2+33% |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+36% | 176 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 704 KB+193% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 295X2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 295X2 carries 8 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN Z gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 320 GB/s x2 (Radeon R9 295X2) — a 5% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Memory bus width is 384-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX TITAN Z and 512-bit x2 on the Radeon R9 295X2. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s x2+5% | 320 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2 | 512-bit x2+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.1+10% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 500W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 307mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W-25% | 500W |
| Recommended PSU | 700W-30% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 307mm |
| Height | 111mm | 114mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5+34% | 17.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z came in at $2999, while the Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499. On MSRP, Radeon R9 295X2 was 50% cheaper ($1500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 295X2) — the Radeon R9 295X2 offers 100% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $1499-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 5.8+100% |
| Codename | GK110B | Vesuvius |
| Release | May 28 2014 | April 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #300 | #303 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Radeon R9 295X2
