
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

GRID P40-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is positioned at rank 149 and the GRID P40-8Q is on rank 265, so the Quadro P4000 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P4000 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P40-8Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID P40-8Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $290), it costs 48% less, resulting in a 93.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+93.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($290) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 (móvel) and GRID P40-8Q

Quadro P4000 (móvel)
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points. Launch price was $819.61.

GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) scores 7,500 and the GRID P40-8Q reaches 7,507 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the GRID P40-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q). Raw compute: 4.398 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q). Boost clocks: 1228 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,500 | 7,507 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.398 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz+4% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB | 768 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the GRID P40-8Q's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 350W (GRID P40-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-56% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 75.0+125% | 33.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) launched at $819 MSRP and currently averages $290, while the GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The GRID P40-8Q costs 48.3% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 50.0 (GRID P40-8Q) — the GRID P40-8Q offers 93.1% better value. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $819-73% | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $290 | $150-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.9 | 50.0+93% |
| Codename | GP104 | GM204 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #326 | #505 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















