
Quadro P520 vs GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro P520
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P520 is positioned at rank #111 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P520
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P520 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 394.8% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P520.
| Insight | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-394.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+394.8%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $150 for the Quadro P520, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1137% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1137%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P520 and GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro P520
The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro P520 scores 2,034 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 394.8%. The Quadro P520 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P520) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1.147 TFLOPS (Quadro P520) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,034 | 10,064+395% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.147 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+674% |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | 1733 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 160+567% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 960 KB+567% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P520 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro P520) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P520 draws 18W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 163.6% difference. The Quadro P520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P520) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18W-90% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | — | 173mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0+102% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P520 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 60% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.6 (Quadro P520) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1133.1% better value. The Quadro P520 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-40% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $60-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | 167.7+1133% |
| Codename | GP108 | GP104 |
| Release | May 23 2019 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #677 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












