Quadro P520 vs Radeon TM R9 A360

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P520 vs Radeon TM R9 A360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P520 vs Radeon TM R9 A360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P520

2019

Why buy it

✅50.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Radeon TM R9 A360 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P520 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 18W instead of 30W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon TM R9 A360

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P520 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 30W vs 18W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P520 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 50.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon TM R9 A360 instead at 2,060 vs 2,034, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P520 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro P520 vs Radeon TM R9 A360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P520

The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.

Radeon TM R9 A360

The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P520 scores 2,034 and the Radeon TM R9 A360 reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P520 is built on Pascal while the Radeon TM R9 A360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P520) vs 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Raw compute: 1.147 TFLOPS (Quadro P520) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon TM R9 A360). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P520	Radeon TM R9 A360
G3D Mark Score	2,034	2,060+1%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.147 TFLOPS+21%	0.9472 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1493 MHz+61%	925 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	144 KB+13%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P520	Radeon TM R9 A360
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P520 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 carries 2 GB. Quadro P520 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P520 and 64-bit on the Radeon TM R9 A360. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro P520) vs 256 KB (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the Quadro P520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P520	Radeon TM R9 A360
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P520 draws 18W versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 30W — a 50% difference. The Quadro P520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P520) vs 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro P520	Radeon TM R9 A360
TDP	18W-40%	30W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	113.0+64%	68.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P520 came in at $150, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon TM R9 A360 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.6 (Quadro P520) vs Infinity (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the Radeon TM R9 A360 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P520 (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro P520	Radeon TM R9 A360
MSRP	$150	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	13.6	Infinity
Codename	GP108	Tropo
Release	May 23 2019	May 5 2015
Ranking	#677	#711

Search Quadro P520 on Amazon

Search Radeon TM R9 A360 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.