Quadro K4000M vs Quadro P520

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4000M vs Quadro P520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4000M vs Quadro P520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4000M

2012

Why buy it

✅37.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌455.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 18W.

Quadro P520

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Quadro K4000M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P520 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 18W instead of 100W, a 82W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K4000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 37.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (2,061 vs 2,034), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P520 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K4000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro K4000M vs Quadro P520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4000M

The Quadro K4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

Quadro P520

The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4000M scores 2,061 and the Quadro P520 reaches 2,034 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000M is built on Kepler while the Quadro P520 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 960 (Quadro K4000M) vs 384 (Quadro P520). Raw compute: 1.154 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000M) vs 1.147 TFLOPS (Quadro P520).

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Quadro P520
G3D Mark Score	2,061+1%	2,034
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	960+150%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.154 TFLOPS	1.147 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+233%	24
L1 Cache	80 KB	144 KB+80%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Quadro P520
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4000M and 64-bit on the Quadro P520.

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Quadro P520
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4000M draws 100W versus the Quadro P520's 18W — a 139% difference. The Quadro P520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000M) vs 350W (Quadro P520). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Quadro P520
TDP	100W	18W-82%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	20.6	113.0+449%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P520 (2019 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Quadro P520
MSRP	—	$150
Codename	GK104	GP108
Release	June 1 2012	May 23 2019
Ranking	#676	#677

Search Quadro K4000M on Amazon

Search Quadro P520 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.