Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX 540

NVIDIA

Quadro K4000M

2012Core: 601 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 540

2017Core: 1124 MHzBoost: 1219 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX 540 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX 540 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX 540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4000M

2012

Why buy it

  • 45.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon RX 540

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Quadro K4000M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 540 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K4000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 540 instead at 2,134 vs 2,061, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 540 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro K4000M is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 540 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K4000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX 540 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K4000M

The Quadro K4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 540

The Radeon RX 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 11 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1124 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,134 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4000M scores 2,061 and the Radeon RX 540 reaches 2,134 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 540 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 960 (Quadro K4000M) vs 512 (Radeon RX 540). Raw compute: 1.154 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000M) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 540).

FeatureQuadro K4000MRadeon RX 540
G3D Mark Score
2,061
2,134+4%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
960+88%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.154 TFLOPS
1.248 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+150%
32
L1 Cache
80 KB
128 KB+60%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 540 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro K4000M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureQuadro K4000MRadeon RX 540
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4000M and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 540.

FeatureQuadro K4000MRadeon RX 540
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 540's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 540). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro K4000MRadeon RX 540
TDP
100W
50W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
20.6
42.7+107%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 540 (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureQuadro K4000MRadeon RX 540
MSRP
$99
Codename
GK104
Lexa
Release
June 1 2012
November 11 2017
Ranking
#676
#602

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.