Quadro K4000M vs Radeon TM R9 A360

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon TM R9 A360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon TM R9 A360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4000M

2012

Why buy it

✅107.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

Radeon TM R9 A360

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K4000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 107.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0% in PassMark G3D (2,061 vs 2,060), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K4000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K4000M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon TM R9 A360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4000M

The Quadro K4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

Radeon TM R9 A360

The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4000M scores 2,061 and the Radeon TM R9 A360 reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon TM R9 A360 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (Quadro K4000M) vs 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Raw compute: 1.154 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000M) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon TM R9 A360).

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon TM R9 A360
G3D Mark Score	2,061	2,060
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	960+88%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.154 TFLOPS+22%	0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L1 Cache	80 KB	128 KB+60%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon TM R9 A360
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 carries 2 GB. Quadro K4000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4000M and 64-bit on the Radeon TM R9 A360. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro K4000M) vs 256 KB (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the Quadro K4000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon TM R9 A360
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000M) vs 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon TM R9 A360
TDP	100W	30W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	20.6	68.7+233%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon TM R9 A360 (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon TM R9 A360
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GK104	Tropo
Release	June 1 2012	May 5 2015
Ranking	#676	#711

Search Quadro K4000M on Amazon

Search Radeon TM R9 A360 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.