
Quadro K4000M vs Radeon 820M

Quadro K4000M
Popular choices:

Radeon 820M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K4000M is positioned at rank 57 and the Radeon 820M is on rank 62, so the Quadro K4000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K4000M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 820M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 820M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2012). The Radeon 820M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K4000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 820M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K4000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K4000M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 820M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4000M and Radeon 820M

Quadro K4000M
The Quadro K4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

Radeon 820M
The Radeon 820M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,143 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K4000M scores 2,061 and the Radeon 820M reaches 2,143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon 820M uses RDNA 3+, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 960 (Quadro K4000M) vs 128 (Radeon 820M).
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,061 | 2,143+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3+ |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+650% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K4000M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 820M has 2 GB. The Quadro K4000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon 820M's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon 820M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000M) vs 350W (Radeon 820M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 30W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 20.6 | 71.4+247% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 820M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $25 |
| Codename | GK104 | Krackan Point |
| Release | June 1 2012 | June 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #676 | #669 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















