Quadro K4000M vs Radeon 550

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon 550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4000M

2012

Why buy it

✅77.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon 550

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K4000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 77.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 550 instead at 2,140 vs 2,061, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K4000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 550 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon 550 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K4000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon 550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4000M

The Quadro K4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

Radeon 550

The Radeon 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,140 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4000M scores 2,061 and the Radeon 550 reaches 2,140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 960 (Quadro K4000M) vs 512 (Radeon 550). Raw compute: 1.154 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000M) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 550).

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon 550
G3D Mark Score	2,061	2,140+4%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	960+88%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.154 TFLOPS	1.211 TFLOPS+5%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L1 Cache	80 KB	128 KB+60%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon 550
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 550 carries 2 GB. Quadro K4000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4000M and 64-bit on the Radeon 550. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro K4000M) vs 256 KB (Radeon 550) — the Quadro K4000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon 550
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon 550's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000M) vs 300W (Radeon 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon 550
TDP	100W	50W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Perf/Watt	20.6	42.8+108%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 550 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon 550
MSRP	—	$79
Codename	GK104	Lexa
Release	June 1 2012	April 20 2017
Ranking	#676	#668

Search Quadro K4000M on Amazon

Search Radeon 550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.