Quadro K4000M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U Performance Spectrum

Quadro K4000M

4 GB 100

2,061

+0.8%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2,044

0.0%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4000M

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
❌132.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 43W.

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U

2025

Why buy it

✅39.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 43W instead of 100W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 39.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K4000M instead at 2,061 vs 2,044, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K4000M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4000M

The Quadro K4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U

The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,044 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4000M scores 2,061 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U reaches 2,044 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 960 (Quadro K4000M) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U). Raw compute: 1.154 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000M) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U).

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
G3D Mark Score	2,061	2,044
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	960	1792+87%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.154 TFLOPS	16.49 TFLOPS+1329%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	112+40%
L1 Cache	80 KB	512 KB+540%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U carries 2 GB. Quadro K4000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4000M and System on the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K4000M) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U's 43W — a 79.7% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
TDP	100W	43W-57%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Perf/Watt	20.6	47.5+131%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U (2025 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K4000M	Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
MSRP	—	$450
Codename	GK104	Navi 33
Release	June 1 2012	August 8 2025
Ranking	#676	#229

Search Quadro K4000M on Amazon

Search Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.