
Quadro K4000M

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
Quadro K4000M vs Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K4000M vs Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro K4000M vs Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K4000M
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
2019Why buy it
- ✅18.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Quadro K4000M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K4000M vs Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4000M
The Quadro K4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.


Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,095 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K4000M scores 2,061 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U reaches 2,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 960 (Quadro K4000M) vs 1,408 (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U). Raw compute: 1.154 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000M) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U).
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,061 | 2,095+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 960 | 1408+47% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.154 TFLOPS | 5.196 TFLOPS+350% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 88+10% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K4000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U carries 2 GB. Quadro K4000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4000M and System on the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U.
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U's 110W — a 9.5% difference. The Quadro K4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-9% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 20.6+8% | 19.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | June 1 2012 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #676 | #297 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














