
Quadro 5000M

Quadro K4000M
Quadro 5000M vs Quadro K4000M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro 5000M vs Quadro K4000M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro 5000M vs Quadro K4000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro 5000M
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro K4000M
2012Why buy it
- ✅8.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 5000M vs Quadro K4000M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 5000M
The Quadro 5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 27 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 405 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

Quadro K4000M
The Quadro K4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 5000M scores 2,060 and the Quadro K4000M reaches 2,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5000M is built on Fermi while the Quadro K4000M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Quadro 5000M) vs 960 (Quadro K4000M). Raw compute: 0.5184 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000M) vs 1.154 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000M).
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Quadro K4000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,060 | 2,061 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 960+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5184 TFLOPS | 1.154 TFLOPS+123% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+700% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Quadro K4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 5000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000M carries 4 GB. Quadro K4000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 5000M and 64-bit on the Quadro K4000M.
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Quadro K4000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 5000M draws 100W versus the Quadro K4000M's 100W — a 0% difference. The Quadro K4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000M) vs 350W (Quadro K4000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Quadro K4000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 20.6 | 20.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














