
Quadro 5000M vs Radeon 550

Quadro 5000M
Popular choices:

Radeon 550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 5000M is positioned at rank #15 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 550 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon 550 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 5000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 5000M.
| Insight | Quadro 5000M | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 550 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5000M and Radeon 550

Quadro 5000M
The Quadro 5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 27 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 405 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

Radeon 550
The Radeon 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,140 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 5000M scores 2,060 and the Radeon 550 reaches 2,140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 320 (Quadro 5000M) vs 512 (Radeon 550). Raw compute: 0.5184 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000M) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 550).
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,060 | 2,140+4% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 512+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5184 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+134% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+400% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 5000M) vs 256 KB (Radeon 550) — the Quadro 5000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 5000M draws 100W versus the Radeon 550's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000M) vs 300W (Radeon 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 20.6 | 42.8+108% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Radeon 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $79 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $79 |
| Codename | GF100 | Lexa |
| Release | July 27 2010 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #675 | #668 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















