Quadro 5000M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
Quadro 5000M
Popular choices:
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 5000M is positioned at rank #15 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is significantly newer (2025 vs 2010). The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 5000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 5000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U.
| Insight | Quadro 5000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 5000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5000M and Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
Quadro 5000M
The Quadro 5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 27 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 405 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,044 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 5000M scores 2,060 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U reaches 2,044 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 320 (Quadro 5000M) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U). Raw compute: 0.5184 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000M) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U).
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,060 | 2,044 |
| Architecture | Fermi | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 1792+460% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5184 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+3081% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 112+180% |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 5000M) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 5000M draws 100W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U's 43W — a 79.7% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 43W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 20.6 | 47.5+131% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 5000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $450 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $450 |
| Codename | GF100 | Navi 33 |
| Release | July 27 2010 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #675 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 5000M and Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
