Quadro 5000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 5000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 5000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 5000M

2010

Why buy it

✅28.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon RX Vega 11 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro 5000M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Radeon RX Vega 11

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 5000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 5000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 28.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX Vega 11 instead at 2,094 vs 2,060, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 5000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX Vega 11 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon RX Vega 11 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 5000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 5000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 5000M

The Quadro 5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 27 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 405 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

Radeon RX Vega 11

The Radeon RX Vega 11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,094 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 5000M scores 2,060 and the Radeon RX Vega 11 reaches 2,094 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon RX Vega 11 uses GCN 5.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 320 (Quadro 5000M) vs 704 (Radeon RX Vega 11). Raw compute: 0.5184 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000M) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 11).

Feature	Quadro 5000M	Radeon RX Vega 11
G3D Mark Score	2,060	2,094+2%
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 5.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	320	704+120%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5184 TFLOPS	1.761 TFLOPS+240%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	40	44+10%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 5000M	Radeon RX Vega 11
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 5000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 carries 0 MB. Quadro 5000M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 5000M and System on the Radeon RX Vega 11.

Feature	Quadro 5000M	Radeon RX Vega 11
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	0 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 5000M draws 100W versus the Radeon RX Vega 11's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 11 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000M) vs 300W (Radeon RX Vega 11). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro 5000M	Radeon RX Vega 11
TDP	100W	35W-65%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	20.6	59.8+190%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 11 (2018 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 5000M	Radeon RX Vega 11
MSRP	—	$149
Codename	GF100	Raven
Release	July 27 2010	May 10 2018
Ranking	#675	#673

Search Quadro 5000M on Amazon

Search Radeon RX Vega 11 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.