Quadro 5000M vs Radeon R9 M385

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 5000M vs Radeon R9 M385 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 5000M vs Radeon R9 M385: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 5000M

2010

Why buy it

✅13.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M385

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 5000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 5000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M385 instead at 2,061 vs 2,060, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 5000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M385 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M385 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 5000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 5000M vs Radeon R9 M385 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 5000M

The Quadro 5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 27 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 405 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

Radeon R9 M385

The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 5000M scores 2,060 and the Radeon R9 M385 reaches 2,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M385 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Quadro 5000M) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385). Raw compute: 0.5184 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000M) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385).

Feature	Quadro 5000M	Radeon R9 M385
G3D Mark Score	2,060	2,061
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	896+180%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5184 TFLOPS	1.792 TFLOPS+246%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	40	56+40%
L1 Cache	640 KB+186%	224 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 5000M	Radeon R9 M385
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 5000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M385 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 5000M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M385. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 5000M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M385) — the Quadro 5000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 5000M	Radeon R9 M385
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 5000M draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M385's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M385 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro 5000M	Radeon R9 M385
TDP	100W	75W-25%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	20.6	27.5+33%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R9 M385 (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 5000M	Radeon R9 M385
MSRP	—	$300
Codename	GF100	Strato
Release	July 27 2010	May 5 2015
Ranking	#675	#674

Search Quadro 5000M on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M385 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.