Quadro 5000M
VS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Quadro 5000M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

NVIDIA

Quadro 5000M

2010Core: 405 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 5000M is positioned at rank #15 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000M

#1
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
215%
#15
Quadro 5000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
65%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
58%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
100%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
95%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
94%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
92%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
91%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
90%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
90%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
89%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
88%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
88%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Why is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro 5000M?

The matchup between the powerful GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and the legacy mobile flagship Quadro 5000M reveal a monumental divide between modern power and previous-gen workstation efficiency. The RTX 3060 Ti delivers roughly 2000% more raw compute performance, representing the jump from a specialized core of 2011 to a desktop powerhouse that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates and cinematic graphics.

Technically, the RTX 3060 Ti wins on absolute architectural scale, featuring 8GB of dedicated fast memory and specialized hardware for Ray Tracing and DLSS support. The Quadro 5000M is based on a legacy architecture and lacks the core count or feature set to handle modern software with any stability. Moving from any notebook with legacy workstation graphics to a 30-series discrete engine is a life-changing improvement for any user seeking world-class speed in 2026.

There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the absolute winner. it provides a level of detail and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, immersive experiences. The Quadro 5000M is now strictly piece of hardware history on legacy laptops. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the 30-series discrete card is the definitive and superior choice.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 5000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 886% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 5000M.

InsightQuadro 5000MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-886%)
Leading raw performance (+886%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5000M and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

NVIDIA

Quadro 5000M

The Quadro 5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 27 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 405 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro 5000M scores 2,060 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 886%. The Quadro 5000M is built on Fermi while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 320 (Quadro 5000M) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.5184 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000M) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

FeatureQuadro 5000MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
2,060
20,312+886%
Architecture
Fermi
Ampere
Process Node
40 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
320
4864+1420%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5184 TFLOPS
16.2 TFLOPS+3025%
ROPs
32
80+150%
TMUs
40
152+280%
L1 Cache
0.63 MB
4.8 MB+662%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 5000MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 5000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 5000M) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro 5000MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
8 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 5000M draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro 5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000M) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.

FeatureQuadro 5000MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP
100W-50%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
20.6
101.6+393%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).

FeatureQuadro 5000MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$280
Codename
GF100
GA104
Release
July 27 2010
December 1 2020
Ranking
#675
#73