Quadro 5000M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro 5000M

100

2,060

+1.7%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN V

Iris Pro Graphics P580

15

2,026

0.0%

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 5000M is positioned at rank 15 and the Iris Pro Graphics P580 is on rank 326, so the Quadro 5000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000M

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

215%

#15

Quadro 5000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

65%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

58%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics P580

#316

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

804%

#318

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

728%

#319

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

727%

#323

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

661%

#324

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

656%

#326

Iris Pro Graphics P580

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

100%

#327

Radeon E8870PCIe

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

100%

#330

Arc Graphics 140T

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

95%

#331

Radeon 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

95%

#333

GeForce 730A

MSRP: $60|Avg: $20

94%

#334

GeForce GT 745A

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

92%

#335

GeForce 710A

MSRP: $35|Avg: $62

92%

#336

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

90%

#338

GeForce MX230

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

90%

#340

RADEON HD6410D

MSRP: $35|Avg: $5

89%

#341

GeForce 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 5000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P580.

Insight	Quadro 5000M	Iris Pro Graphics P580
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 5000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro 5000M Benchmark Check

Iris Pro Graphics P580 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5000M and Iris Pro Graphics P580

Quadro 5000M

The Quadro 5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 27 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 405 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

Iris Pro Graphics P580

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 5000M scores 2,060 and the Iris Pro Graphics P580 reaches 2,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5000M is built on Fermi while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 320 (Quadro 5000M) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Raw compute: 0.5184 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000M) vs 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580).

Feature	Quadro 5000M	Iris Pro Graphics P580
G3D Mark Score	2,060+2%	2,026
Architecture	Fermi	Generation 9.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm+
Shading Units	320	576+80%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5184 TFLOPS	1.21 TFLOPS+133%
ROPs	32+256%	9
TMUs	40	72+80%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 5000M	Iris Pro Graphics P580
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 5000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 0 MB. The Quadro 5000M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	Quadro 5000M	Iris Pro Graphics P580
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 5000M draws 100W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P580's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000M) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.