
Quadro P520

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
Quadro P520 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P520 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P520 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P520
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 110W, a 92W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
2019Why buy it
- ✅62.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Quadro P520 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 13.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌511.1% higher power demand at 110W vs 18W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P520 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P520
The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.


Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,095 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P520 scores 2,034 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U reaches 2,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P520 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P520) vs 1,408 (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U). Raw compute: 1.147 TFLOPS (Quadro P520) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,034 | 2,095+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1408+267% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.147 TFLOPS | 5.196 TFLOPS+353% |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | 1845 MHz+24% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P520 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U carries 2 GB. Quadro P520 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P520 and System on the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P520 draws 18W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U's 110W — a 143.8% difference. The Quadro P520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P520) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18W-84% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0+495% | 19.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P520 came in at $150, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U launched at $300. On MSRP, Quadro P520 was 50% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.6 (Quadro P520) vs 7.0 (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U) — the Quadro P520 offers 94.3% better value.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-50% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6+94% | 7.0 |
| Codename | GP108 | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 23 2019 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #677 | #297 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















