
Quadro P520 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2

Quadro P520
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 460 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P520 is positioned at rank #111 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P520
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P520 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Quadro P520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460 v2.
| Insight | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 460 v2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $150 for the Quadro P520, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 197.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+197.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P520 and GeForce GTX 460 v2

Quadro P520
The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.

GeForce GTX 460 v2
The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 779 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,016 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P520 scores 2,034 and the GeForce GTX 460 v2 reaches 2,016 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P520 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P520) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 v2). Raw compute: 1.147 TFLOPS (Quadro P520) vs 1.046 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 v2).
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,034 | 2,016 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+14% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.147 TFLOPS+10% | 1.046 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 24 | 56+133% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 448 KB+211% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P520 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 1 GB. The Quadro P520 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro P520) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460 v2) — the Quadro P520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P520 draws 18W versus the GeForce GTX 460 v2's 160W — a 159.6% difference. The Quadro P520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P520) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 v2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18W-89% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 210mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0+797% | 12.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P520 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 launched at $199 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.6 (Quadro P520) vs 40.3 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) — the GeForce GTX 460 v2 offers 196.3% better value. The Quadro P520 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-25% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $50-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | 40.3+196% |
| Codename | GP108 | GF114 |
| Release | May 23 2019 | September 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #677 | #679 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












