Quadro P520 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
Quadro P520
Popular choices:
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P520 is positioned at rank 111 and the Iris Pro Graphics P580 is on rank 326, so the Quadro P520 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P520
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics P580
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P520 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P580.
| Insight | Quadro P520 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $150 for the Quadro P520, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 149% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P520 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+149%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P520 and Iris Pro Graphics P580
Quadro P520
The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.
Iris Pro Graphics P580
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P520 scores 2,034 and the Iris Pro Graphics P580 reaches 2,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P520 is built on Pascal while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 14 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P520) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Raw compute: 1.147 TFLOPS (Quadro P520) vs 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,034 | 2,026 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 384 | 576+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.147 TFLOPS | 1.21 TFLOPS+5% |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz+42% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+78% | 9 |
| TMUs | 24 | 72+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P520 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 0 MB. The Quadro P520 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P520 draws 18W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P580's 15W — a 18.2% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P520) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18W | 15W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0 | 135.1+20% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P520 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 launched at $150 and now averages $60. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 costs 60% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.6 (Quadro P520) vs 33.8 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) — the Iris Pro Graphics P580 offers 148.5% better value. The Quadro P520 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $60-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | 33.8+149% |
| Codename | GP108 | Skylake GT4e |
| Release | May 23 2019 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #677 | #678 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P520 and Iris Pro Graphics P580
