Quadro P520 vs GeForce GTX 765M
Quadro P520
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 765M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P520 is positioned at rank 111 and the GeForce GTX 765M is on rank 109, so the GeForce GTX 765M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P520
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 765M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P520 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Quadro P520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 765M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 765M.
| Insight | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P520 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P520 and GeForce GTX 765M
Quadro P520
The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.
GeForce GTX 765M
The GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 863 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,014 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P520 scores 2,034 and the GeForce GTX 765M reaches 2,014 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P520 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 765M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P520) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 765M). Raw compute: 1.147 TFLOPS (Quadro P520) vs 1.326 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 765M). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 863 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,034 | 2,014 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 768+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.147 TFLOPS | 1.326 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz+73% | 863 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+125% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P520 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 765M has 2 GB. The Quadro P520 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro P520) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTX 765M) — the Quadro P520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P520 draws 18W versus the GeForce GTX 765M's 75W — a 122.6% difference. The Quadro P520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P520) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 765M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18W-76% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0+320% | 26.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P520 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro P520 | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | — |
| Codename | GP108 | GK106 |
| Release | May 23 2019 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #677 | #680 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P520 and GeForce GTX 765M
