Quadro RTX 5000 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 5000

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

184%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

179%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

176%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

162%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

154%

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

134%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

129%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

113%

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

106%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

105%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

104%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

100%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

100%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

96%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

93%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

92%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

90%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

89%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

87%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

83%

#87

A10G

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000

81%

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

80%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

79%

#90

Quadro P5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

76%

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

75%

#92

RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

73%

#93

Quadro RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

73%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

#16

Radeon RX 7600S

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

110%

#19

Radeon RX 5600

MSRP: $229|Avg: $150

97%

#22

Radeon RX 7700

MSRP: $449|Avg: $399

94%

#25

Radeon RX 7600M XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $300

85%

#28

Radeon RX 6650M XT

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

81%

#29

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

77%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

77%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro RTX 5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 17.3% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (16 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU.

Insight	Quadro RTX 5000	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+17.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-17.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022))	🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+166.7%)	🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 5000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 5000 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 and GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

Quadro RTX 5000

The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro RTX 5000 scores 15,443 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU's 13,170 — the Quadro RTX 5000 leads by 17.3%. The Quadro RTX 5000 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1815 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 28 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) with 384 Tensor cores vs 112.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
G3D Mark Score	15,443+17%	13,170
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	3072	3584+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.15 TFLOPS	12.74 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock	1815 MHz+2%	1777 MHz
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	192+71%	112
L1 Cache	3 MB	3.5 MB+17%
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	48+71%	28
Tensor Cores	384+243%	112

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has 6 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) — a 33.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) — the Quadro RTX 5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+167%	6 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+33%	336 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU).

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Encoder	NVENC (7th Gen)	NVENC (7th Gen)
Decoder	NVDEC (4th Gen)	NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 5000 draws 230W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU's 170W — a 30% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.