Quadro T1000 (móvel) vs FirePro S9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is positioned at rank 139 and the FirePro S9000 is on rank 291, so the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 (móvel)

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

90%

#123

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1477%

#138

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

100%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

100%

#140

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

99%

#141

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

99%

#142

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

98%

#143

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

96%

#144

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

96%

#145

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

95%

#146

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

94%

#147

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

92%

#148

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

92%

#150

FirePro M40003

MSRP: $150|Avg: $72

91%

#151

Radeon Pro 465

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

91%

#153

Tesla P4

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9000

#112

GRID RTX6000-1Q

MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500

99%

#113

Quadro RTX 8000

MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999

99%

#114

Quadro GP100

MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335

97%

#115

Radeon Instinct MI60

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600

96%

#276

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

7313%

#291

FirePro S9000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156

100%

#294

GRID P40-4Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

98%

#295

RTXA5000-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

98%

#296

GRID P6-2Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

97%

#300

GRID K220Q

MSRP: $469|Avg: $40

96%

#301

FirePro W9100

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200

96%

#302

GRID T4-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000

94%

#303

FirePro 3D V3700

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

90%

#304

GRID T4-1Q

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600

87%

#305

GRID M60-2Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

86%

#306

NVS 310

MSRP: $159|Avg: $10

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The Quadro T1000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro S9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1000 (móvel).

Insight	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	FirePro S9000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $156 for the FirePro S9000, it costs 23% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 28.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	FirePro S9000
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+28.5%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($120)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($156)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro T1000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

FirePro S9000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 (móvel) and FirePro S9000

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

FirePro S9000

The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) scores 5,000 and the FirePro S9000 reaches 5,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the FirePro S9000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 1,792 (FirePro S9000). Raw compute: 2.235 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000).

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	FirePro S9000
G3D Mark Score	5,000	5,059+1%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1792+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.235 TFLOPS	3.226 TFLOPS+44%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	112+133%
L1 Cache	768 KB+71%	448 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	FirePro S9000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro S9000) — the Quadro T1000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	FirePro S9000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) draws 50W versus the FirePro S9000's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 350W (FirePro S9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	FirePro S9000
TDP	50W-78%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	90°C
Perf/Watt	100.0+344%	22.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the FirePro S9000 launched at $2499 and now averages $156. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) costs 23.1% less ($36 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.7 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 32.4 (FirePro S9000) — the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 28.7% better value. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).