Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Arc A370M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro T1000 Max-Q

50

5,000

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Arc A370M

35

5,115

+2.3%

Iris Plus Graphics 655

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is positioned at rank 17 and the Arc A370M is on rank 211, so the Quadro T1000 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 Max-Q

#2

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

236%

#17

Quadro T1000 Max-Q

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

71%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

64%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A370M

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

88%

#201

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

422%

#203

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

383%

#204

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

382%

#208

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

347%

#209

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

345%

#211

Arc A370M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#212

GeForce GTX 780M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

100%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

95%

#221

Radeon HD 6550A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

92%

#222

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

91%

#224

GeForce GT 640M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc A370M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1000 Max-Q.

Insight	Quadro T1000 Max-Q	Arc A370M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A370M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro T1000 Max-Q Benchmark Check

Arc A370M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 Max-Q and Arc A370M

Quadro T1000 Max-Q

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 765 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q scores 5,000 and the Arc A370M reaches 5,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is built on Turing while the Arc A370M uses Generation 12.7, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 896 (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 1,024 (Arc A370M). Raw compute: 2.419 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1550 MHz.

Feature	Quadro T1000 Max-Q	Arc A370M
G3D Mark Score	5,000	5,115+2%
Architecture	Turing	Generation 12.7
Process Node	12 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	896	1024+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.419 TFLOPS	3.174 TFLOPS+31%
Boost Clock	1350 MHz	1550 MHz+15%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1.5 MB+70%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T1000 Max-Q	Arc A370M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	XeSS
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 4 MB (Arc A370M) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro T1000 Max-Q	Arc A370M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q draws 50W versus the Arc A370M's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 350W (Arc A370M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.