Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1630
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is positioned at rank #17 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1630.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro T1000 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1630
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 765 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 Max-Q scores 5,000 and the GeForce GTX 1630 reaches 4,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1630 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 1630). Raw compute: 2.419 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000 | 4,992 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+75% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.419 TFLOPS+32% | 1.828 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1785 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+75% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 Max-Q draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1630's 75W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+50% | 66.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $90 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU117 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | June 28 2022 |
| Ranking | #364 | #444 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro T1000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1630
