Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs CMP 30HX
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Popular choices:
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is positioned at rank 17 and the CMP 30HX is on rank 190, so the Quadro T1000 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Performance Per Dollar CMP 30HX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 30HX.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 Max-Q | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro T1000 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 Max-Q and CMP 30HX
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 765 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 Max-Q scores 5,000 and the CMP 30HX reaches 4,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is built on Turing while the CMP 30HX uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 1,408 (CMP 30HX). Raw compute: 2.419 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 Max-Q | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000+2% | 4,892 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1408+57% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.419 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS+108% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1785 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 88+57% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1.4 MB+59% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 Max-Q | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro T1000 Max-Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the CMP 30HX has 2 GB. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 Max-Q | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 Max-Q draws 50W versus the CMP 30HX's 125W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 350W (CMP 30HX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 Max-Q | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-60% | 125W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+156% | 39.1 |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 Max-Q | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $60 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU116 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | February 25 2021 |
| Ranking | #364 | #447 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro T1000 Max-Q and CMP 30HX
