Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 570

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is positioned at rank #2 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000 Max-Q

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

127%

#2

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 570 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T2000 Max-Q.

Insight	Quadro T2000 Max-Q	Radeon RX 570
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 570 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro T2000 Max-Q Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 570 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T2000 Max-Q and Radeon RX 570

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

Radeon RX 570

The Radeon RX 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1244 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,967 points. Launch price was $169.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q scores 6,959 and the Radeon RX 570 reaches 6,967 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 570). Raw compute: 3.318 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 Max-Q) vs 5.095 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 570). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 1244 MHz.

Feature	Quadro T2000 Max-Q	Radeon RX 570
G3D Mark Score	6,959	6,967
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024	2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.318 TFLOPS	5.095 TFLOPS+54%
Boost Clock	1620 MHz+30%	1244 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	128+100%
L1 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T2000 Max-Q	Radeon RX 570
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T2000 Max-Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 570) — the Radeon RX 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro T2000 Max-Q	Radeon RX 570
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q) vs 12 (Radeon RX 570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.

Feature	Quadro T2000 Max-Q	Radeon RX 570
DirectX	12.1	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	5+25%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 570). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q) vs H.265,H.264 (Radeon RX 570).

Feature	Quadro T2000 Max-Q	Radeon RX 570
Encoder	NVENC 7.0	VCE 3.4
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP9	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.265,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q draws 40W versus the Radeon RX 570's 120W — a 100% difference. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T2000 Max-Q) vs 450W (Radeon RX 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Quadro T2000 Max-Q	Radeon RX 570
TDP	40W-67%	120W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	0mm	241mm
Height	0mm	120mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	174.0+199%	58.1