
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is positioned at rank #635 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 530.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-530.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+530.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $400 for the Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU, it costs 63% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1581.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1581.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,886 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU scores 1,886 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 530.5%.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,886 | 11,892+531% |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 135 GB/s (Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 65.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 135 GB/s | 224 GB/s+66% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU draws 7W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 179.6% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-95% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 269.4+194% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU launched at $899 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 62.5% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.7 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1587.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $249-72% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $150-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.7 | 79.3+1587% |
| Codename | — | GA106 |
| Release | December 6 2018 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #916 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















