
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Popular choices:

Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+10.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.
Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,449 vs 6,000).
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅+10.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,449 vs 6,000).
Quick Answers
So, is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS better than Radeon 760M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 760M make more sense than Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and Radeon 760M
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS scores 6,000 versus the Radeon 760M's 5,449 — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS leads by 10.1%. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2599 MHz.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,000+10% | 5,449 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+200% | 512 |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 2599 MHz+108% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 760M has 4 GB. The Radeon 760M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 135 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS draws 30W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 15W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 200.0 | 363.3+82% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | — | Phoenix |
| Release | October 26 2023 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #459 | #421 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













