Radeon 3000 vs Quadro FX 370M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 370M

#339

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

15885%

#354

Quadro FX 370M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#355

FirePro 3D V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

98%

#356

Quadro FX 580

MSRP: $199|Avg: $500

98%

#358

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

97%

#359

FireStream 9270

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20

96%

#360

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

95%

#361

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

95%

#362

Quadro FX 380 LP

MSRP: $169|Avg: $15

92%

#364

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

87%

#365

FirePro 3D V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229

86%

#366

FirePro 3D V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80

86%

#367

Quadro 5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100

85%

#368

FirePro V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $20

84%

#369

FirePro V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 3000 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon 3000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 370M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 370M.

Insight	Radeon 3000	Quadro FX 370M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+5.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.4%)
Longevity	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 3000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 3000 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 370M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 3000 and Quadro FX 370M

Radeon 3000

The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

Quadro FX 370M

The Quadro FX 370M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 93 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 3000 scores 98 versus the Quadro FX 370M's 93 — the Radeon 3000 leads by 5.4%. The Radeon 3000 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro FX 370M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3000) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370M). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370M).

Feature	Radeon 3000	Quadro FX 370M
G3D Mark Score	98+5%	93
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	512+113%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.247 TFLOPS+100%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 3000	Quadro FX 370M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 3000 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 370M has 256 MB. The Radeon 3000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon 3000) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 370M) — the Radeon 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 3000	Quadro FX 370M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 3000 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 370M's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3000) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.