Radeon 3015e
VS
GeForce 9800M GTS

Radeon 3015e vs GeForce 9800M GTS

AMD

Radeon 3015e

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9800M GTS

2008Core: 500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 3015e is positioned at rank 414 and the GeForce 9800M GTS is on rank 658, so the Radeon 3015e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3015e

#404
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1516%
#406
1375%
#407
1371%
#411
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1247%
#412
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1238%
#414
Radeon 3015e
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#415
Radeon HD 7620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#416
Radeon R9 M390X
MSRP: $550|Avg: $120
99%
#417
Arc 8-Core iGPU
MSRP: $503|Avg: $400
97%
#418
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $20
97%
#419
96%
#420
Radeon R9 M385
MSRP: $300|Avg: $60
96%
#421
Radeon R5 235
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
96%
#422
Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
96%
#423
Radeon HD 6620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#424
Radeon R5 310
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#425
Radeon HD 7690M XT
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
94%
#426
Radeon HD 7600G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
93%
#427
Radeon R7 A265
MSRP: $149|Avg: $149
93%
#428
Radeon R9 M470
MSRP: $350|Avg: $80
93%
#429
Radeon R9 M385X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GTS

#646
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
6065%
#648
5498%
#649
5484%
#653
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4987%
#654
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
4953%
#656
GeForce 8600 GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#657
100%
#658
GeForce 9800M GTS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
100%
#659
Radeon HD 2900 GT
MSRP: $170|Avg: $15
96%
#660
Radeon HD 8280E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $110
96%
#661
Radeon R5 M420
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
94%
#662
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
94%
#663
Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
93%
#664
Mobility Radeon 4100
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
92%
#665
Radeon HD 2900 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
92%
#666
GeForce 9300 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
92%
#667
GeForce 9700M GT
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
92%
#668
Mobility Radeon X2500
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
92%
#669
GeForce 9800M GTX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $30
84%
#670
Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $57
84%
#671
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 3015e is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon 3015e likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9800M GTS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9800M GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3015e.

InsightRadeon 3015eGeForce 9800M GTS
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9800M GTS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon 3015e, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 232.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon 3015eGeForce 9800M GTS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+232.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 3015e and GeForce 9800M GTS

AMD

Radeon 3015e

The Radeon 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 351 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800M GTS

The GeForce 9800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 357 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 3015e scores 351 and the GeForce 9800M GTS reaches 357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3015e is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce 9800M GTS uses G9x, both on 14 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3015e) vs 224 (GeForce 9800M GTS).

FeatureRadeon 3015eGeForce 9800M GTS
G3D Mark Score
351
357+2%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
G9x
Process Node
14 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
512+129%
224

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 3015eGeForce 9800M GTS
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon 3015eGeForce 9800M GTS
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon 3015e) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9800M GTS). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureRadeon 3015eGeForce 9800M GTS
DirectX
12 (12_1)+20%
10.0
Vulkan
1.2
None
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 1.0 (Radeon 3015e) vs No (GeForce 9800M GTS). Decoder: VCN 1.0 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 3015e) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9800M GTS).

FeatureRadeon 3015eGeForce 9800M GTS
Encoder
VCN 1.0
No
Decoder
VCN 1.0
PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 3015e draws 50W versus the GeForce 9800M GTS's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 3015e is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3015e) vs 350W (GeForce 9800M GTS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon 3015eGeForce 9800M GTS
TDP
50W-67%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
7.0+192%
2.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 3015e launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 9800M GTS launched at $200 and now averages $15. The GeForce 9800M GTS costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.2 (Radeon 3015e) vs 23.8 (GeForce 9800M GTS) — the GeForce 9800M GTS offers 230.6% better value. The Radeon 3015e is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon 3015eGeForce 9800M GTS
MSRP
$49-76%
$200
Avg Price (30d)
$49
$15-69%
Performance per Dollar
7.2
23.8+231%
Codename
Polaris 23
NB9E-GTX
Release
May 13 2019
July 15 2008
Ranking
#757
#825