Radeon 3015e vs GeForce GT 335M
Radeon 3015e
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 335M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 3015e is positioned at rank 414 and the GeForce GT 335M is on rank 131, so the GeForce GT 335M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3015e
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 335M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 3015e is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Radeon 3015e likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 335M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 335M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3015e.
| Insight | Radeon 3015e | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.8%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 335M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $49 for the Radeon 3015e, it costs 49% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 105.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 3015e | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+105.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 3015e and GeForce GT 335M
Radeon 3015e
The Radeon 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 351 points.
GeForce GT 335M
The GeForce GT 335M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 368 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 3015e scores 351 and the GeForce GT 335M reaches 368 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3015e is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GT 335M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3015e) vs 384 (GeForce GT 335M). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3015e) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 335M).
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 351 | 368+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS+66% | 0.7526 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 3015e comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 335M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 335M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon 3015e) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 335M) — the Radeon 3015e has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon 3015e) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 335M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+8% | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 1.0 (Radeon 3015e) vs None (GeForce GT 335M). Decoder: VCN 1.0 vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 3015e) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 335M).
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 1.0 | VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 3015e draws 50W versus the GeForce GT 335M's 50W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GT 335M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3015e) vs 350W (GeForce GT 335M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.0 | 7.4+6% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 335M costs 49% less ($24 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.2 (Radeon 3015e) vs 14.7 (GeForce GT 335M) — the GeForce GT 335M offers 104.2% better value. The Radeon 3015e is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $25-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 14.7+104% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | GK107 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | June 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #757 | #726 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 3015e and GeForce GT 335M
