
Radeon 3015e vs Radeon R4

Radeon 3015e
Popular choices:

Radeon R4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 3015e is positioned at rank 414 and the Radeon R4 is on rank 279, so the Radeon R4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3015e
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R4
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 3015e uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 3015e likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R4 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 3015e is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R4.
| Insight | Radeon 3015e | Radeon R4 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R4 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $49 for the Radeon 3015e, it costs 59% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 141.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 3015e | Radeon R4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+141.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 3015e and Radeon R4

Radeon 3015e
The Radeon 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 351 points.

Radeon R4
The Radeon R4 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 346 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 3015e scores 351 and the Radeon R4 reaches 346 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3015e is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R4 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3015e) vs 384 (Radeon R4). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3015e) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R4). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | Radeon R4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 351+1% | 346 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS+37% | 0.9085 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz+8% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | Radeon R4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | Radeon R4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 3015e draws 50W versus the Radeon R4's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3015e) vs 350W (Radeon R4). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | Radeon R4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 7.0+1% | 6.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 3015e launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon R4 launched at $100 and now averages $20. The Radeon R4 costs 59.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.2 (Radeon 3015e) vs 17.3 (Radeon R4) — the Radeon R4 offers 140.3% better value. The Radeon 3015e is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | Radeon R4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-51% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $20-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 17.3+140% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Lexa |
| Release | May 13 2019 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #757 | #773 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












