CPU
GPU
Radeon 3015e
Popular choices:
Radeon HD4670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 3015e is positioned at rank 414 and the Radeon HD4670 is on rank 216, so the Radeon HD4670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3015e
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD4670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 3015e is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon 3015e likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD4670 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD4670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3015e.
| Insight | Radeon 3015e | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.3%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD4670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon 3015e, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 240.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 3015e | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+240.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 3015e and Radeon HD4670
Radeon 3015e
The Radeon 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 351 points.
Radeon HD4670
The Radeon HD4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 366 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 3015e scores 351 and the Radeon HD4670 reaches 366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3015e is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon HD4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3015e) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD4670). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3015e) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4670). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 351 | 366+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1536+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+117% |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz+38% | 880 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 96+200% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 3015e draws 50W versus the Radeon HD4670's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 3015e is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3015e) vs 300W (Radeon HD4670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-80% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 7.0+367% | 1.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 3015e launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon HD4670 launched at $67 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD4670 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.2 (Radeon 3015e) vs 24.4 (Radeon HD4670) — the Radeon HD4670 offers 238.9% better value. The Radeon 3015e is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon 3015e | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-27% | $67 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 24.4+239% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Cayman |
| Release | May 13 2019 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #757 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 3015e and Radeon HD4670
