
GeForce GT 335M

Radeon 3015e
GeForce GT 335M vs Radeon 3015e Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 335M vs Radeon 3015e FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 335M vs Radeon 3015e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 335M
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 3015e across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Radeon 3015e
2019Why buy it
- ✅27.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅GeForce GT 335M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 3015e is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 335M vs Radeon 3015e Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 335M
The GeForce GT 335M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 368 points.

Radeon 3015e
The Radeon 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 351 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 335M scores 368 and the Radeon 3015e reaches 351 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 335M is built on Kepler while the Radeon 3015e uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 335M) vs 512 (Radeon 3015e). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 335M) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3015e).
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 368+5% | 351 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7526 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+66% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 128 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 335M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 3015e leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 335M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 3015e carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 335M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 335M and 64-bit on the Radeon 3015e. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 335M) vs 512 KB (Radeon 3015e) — the Radeon 3015e has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 335M) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon 3015e). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1)+8% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 335M) vs VCN 1.0 (Radeon 3015e). Decoder: VP4 vs VCN 1.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 335M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 3015e).
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCN 1.0 |
| Decoder | VP4 | VCN 1.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 335M draws 50W versus the Radeon 3015e's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 3015e is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 335M) vs 350W (Radeon 3015e). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.4+6% | 7.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 3015e (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Codename | GK107 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | June 25 2013 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #726 | #757 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















