Radeon 3100
VS
GeForce 9300 SE

Radeon 3100 vs GeForce 9300 SE

AMD

Radeon 3100

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9300 SE

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 3100 is positioned at rank 727 and the GeForce 9300 SE is on rank 668, so the GeForce 9300 SE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3100

#717
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
29343%
#719
26600%
#720
26530%
#724
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
24124%
#725
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
23959%
#727
Radeon 3100
MSRP: $199|Avg: $30
100%
#728
GeForce 6800 GT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
97%
#729
GeForce 7950 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $80
92%
#730
Mobility Radeon X1450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
89%
#731
MOBILITY RADEON X1800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
89%
#732
MOBILITY RADEON 9550
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
81%
#733
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
81%
#734
GeForce 6200
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
78%
#736
GeForce FX 5500
MSRP: $37|Avg: $30
59%
#737
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
54%
#738
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
54%
#739
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
43%
#740
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
41%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
27%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300 SE

#656
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
6620%
#658
6001%
#659
5985%
#663
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
5443%
#664
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
5405%
#666
GeForce 9700M GT
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
100%
#667
Mobility Radeon X2500
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#668
GeForce 9300 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#669
GeForce 9800M GTX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $30
92%
#670
Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $57
92%
#671
91%
#672
GeForce 505
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
88%
#673
GeForce 9200M GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
88%
#674
Mobility Radeon. HD 5470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
87%
#675
Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $40
87%
#676
GeForce 7500 LE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
87%
#677
GeForce 9650M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
84%
#678
GeForce 9650M GS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
83%
#679
GeForce 8400 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
83%
#680
GeForce 8400M GT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $30
82%
#681
GeForce 9200M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 3100 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 3100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9300 SE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9300 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3100.

InsightRadeon 3100GeForce 9300 SE
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-10.8%)
Leading raw performance (+10.8%)
Longevity
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9300 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $30 for the Radeon 3100, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 232.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon 3100GeForce 9300 SE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+232.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 3100 and GeForce 9300 SE

AMD

Radeon 3100

The Radeon 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300 SE

The GeForce 9300 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 3100 scores 74 versus the GeForce 9300 SE's 82 — the GeForce 9300 SE leads by 10.8%. The Radeon 3100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce 9300 SE uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3100) vs 384 (GeForce 9300 SE). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3100) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 SE). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 941 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 3100GeForce 9300 SE
G3D Mark Score
74
82+11%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Maxwell
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.247 TFLOPS+73%
0.7227 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1218 MHz+29%
941 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB
192 KB+50%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 3100GeForce 9300 SE
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon 3100) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9300 SE) — the GeForce 9300 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 3100GeForce 9300 SE
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 3100 draws 50W versus the GeForce 9300 SE's 33W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 9300 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3100) vs 350W (GeForce 9300 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon 3100GeForce 9300 SE
TDP
50W
33W-34%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
1.5
2.5+67%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 3100 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce 9300 SE launched at $50 and now averages $10. The GeForce 9300 SE costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.5 (Radeon 3100) vs 8.2 (GeForce 9300 SE) — the GeForce 9300 SE offers 228% better value. The Radeon 3100 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon 3100GeForce 9300 SE
MSRP
$199
$50-75%
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$10-67%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
8.2+228%
Codename
Polaris 23
GM108
Release
May 13 2019
March 13 2015
Ranking
#757
#810