
Radeon 530
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7690M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 530
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.
Radeon HD 7690M XT
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon 530
2017Radeon HD 7690M XT
2013Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 530 better than Radeon HD 7690M XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 7690M XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 530 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 530 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 530 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 11 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 530 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 530 and Radeon HD 7690M XT

Radeon 530
Radeon 530
The Radeon 530 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,037 points.

Radeon HD 7690M XT
Radeon HD 7690M XT
The Radeon HD 7690M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 530 scores 1,037 and the Radeon HD 7690M XT reaches 1,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 530 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon HD 7690M XT uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 530) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 530) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7690M XT).
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,037+3% | 1,009 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 480+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS+13% | 0.696 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+100% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 530 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7690M XT has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 7690M XT offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 530) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7690M XT) — the Radeon HD 7690M XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon 530) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0)+7% | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon 530) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 530 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 7690M XT's 25W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 7690M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 530) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 25W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 20.7 | 40.4+95% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 530 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7690M XT launched at $150. The Radeon 530 costs 100+% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon 530) vs 6.7 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) — the Radeon 530 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon 530 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 6.7 |
| Codename | Weston | Thames |
| Release | April 18 2017 | January 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #873 | #883 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












