Radeon 540 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 540
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 540 is positioned at rank #93 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 540
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 540 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 540 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Plus Graphics 650 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $40), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 175.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 540 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+175.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 540 and Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 540
The Radeon 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points. Launch price was $79.
Iris Plus Graphics 650
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 540 scores 1,452 and the Iris Plus Graphics 650 reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 540 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses Generation 9.5, both on 14 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 540) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon 540) vs 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 540 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,452 | 1,500+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS+3% | 0.8832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1150 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 16+167% | 6 |
| TMUs | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 540 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 540 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 0 MB. The Radeon 540 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon 540 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 540 draws 50W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 650's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 540) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon 540 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 15W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 29.0 | 100.0+245% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 540 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0 and now averages $15. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.3 (Radeon 540) vs 100.0 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) — the Iris Plus Graphics 650 offers 175.5% better value.
| Feature | Radeon 540 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $15-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.3 | 100.0+175% |
| Codename | Lexa | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Release | April 20 2017 | January 3 2017 |
| Ranking | #773 | #718 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 540 and Iris Plus Graphics 650
