Radeon 540 vs Radeon R9 M365X

AMD

Radeon 540

2017Core: 1183 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M365X

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 540 vs Radeon R9 M365X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 540 vs Radeon R9 M365X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 540 vs Radeon R9 M365X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 540

2017

Why buy it

  • 13.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $151 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 147.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M365X

2015

Why buy it

  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon 540 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 152.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $250 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 540 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M365X instead at 1,482 vs 1,452, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 540 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 540 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 147.4% (14.7 vs 5.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon 540 vs Radeon R9 M365X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 540

The Radeon 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon R9 M365X

The Radeon R9 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,482 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 540 scores 1,452 and the Radeon R9 M365X reaches 1,482 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 540 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 M365X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 540) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M365X). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon 540) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M365X). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 540Radeon R9 M365X
G3D Mark Score
1,452
1,482+2%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9085 TFLOPS
1.184 TFLOPS+30%
Boost Clock
1124 MHz+22%
925 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
96 KB
160 KB+67%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 540Radeon R9 M365X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 540 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M365X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M365X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 540 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M365X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon 540) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M365X) — the Radeon 540 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 540Radeon R9 M365X
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 540 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M365X's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 540) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M365X). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon 540Radeon R9 M365X
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Perf/Watt
29.0+46%
19.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 540 came in at $99, while the Radeon R9 M365X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon 540 was 60.4% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.7 (Radeon 540) vs 5.9 (Radeon R9 M365X) — the Radeon 540 offers 149.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 540 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon 540Radeon R9 M365X
MSRP
$99-60%
$250
Performance per Dollar
14.7+149%
5.9
Codename
Lexa
Tropo
Release
April 20 2017
May 5 2015
Ranking
#773
#769

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.