Quadro 4000 vs Radeon 540

NVIDIA

Quadro 4000

2010Core: 475 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 540

2017Core: 1183 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon 540 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon 540 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon 540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 4000

2010

Why buy it

  • 38.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1111.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,199 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 184% higher power demand at 142W vs 50W.

Radeon 540

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1092.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 142W, a 92W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro 4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 38.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,475 vs 1,452), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 540 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,100 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $1,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1092.2% (14.7 vs 1.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon 540 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 4000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon 540 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 4000

The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.

AMD

Radeon 540

The Radeon 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 and the Radeon 540 reaches 1,452 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon 540 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 384 (Radeon 540). Raw compute: 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon 540).

FeatureQuadro 4000Radeon 540
G3D Mark Score
1,475+2%
1,452
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
256
384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4864 TFLOPS
0.9085 TFLOPS+87%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
512 KB+433%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 4000Radeon 540
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 4000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 540 carries 512 MB. Quadro 4000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 4000 and 64-bit on the Radeon 540.

FeatureQuadro 4000Radeon 540
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the Radeon 540's 50W — a 95.8% difference. The Radeon 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 350W (Radeon 540). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro 4000Radeon 540
TDP
142W
50W-65%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Perf/Watt
10.4
29.0+179%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 4000 came in at $1199, while the Radeon 540 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon 540 was 91.7% cheaper ($1100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (Quadro 4000) vs 14.7 (Radeon 540) — the Radeon 540 offers 1125% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 540 (2017 vs 2010).

FeatureQuadro 4000Radeon 540
MSRP
$1199
$99-92%
Performance per Dollar
1.2
14.7+1125%
Codename
GF100
Lexa
Release
November 2 2010
April 20 2017
Ranking
#770
#773

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.