
Quadro 4000

Radeon 540
Quadro 4000 vs Radeon 540 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro 4000 vs Radeon 540 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro 4000 vs Radeon 540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro 4000
2010Why buy it
- ✅38.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1111.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌184% higher power demand at 142W vs 50W.
Radeon 540
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1092.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 142W, a 92W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 4000 vs Radeon 540 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 4000
The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Radeon 540
The Radeon 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 and the Radeon 540 reaches 1,452 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon 540 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 384 (Radeon 540). Raw compute: 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon 540).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Radeon 540 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,475+2% | 1,452 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4864 TFLOPS | 0.9085 TFLOPS+87% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+433% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Radeon 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 4000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 540 carries 512 MB. Quadro 4000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 4000 and 64-bit on the Radeon 540.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Radeon 540 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the Radeon 540's 50W — a 95.8% difference. The Radeon 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 350W (Radeon 540). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Radeon 540 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 142W | 50W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 10.4 | 29.0+179% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro 4000 came in at $1199, while the Radeon 540 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon 540 was 91.7% cheaper ($1100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (Quadro 4000) vs 14.7 (Radeon 540) — the Radeon 540 offers 1125% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 540 (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Radeon 540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $99-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 14.7+1125% |
| Codename | GF100 | Lexa |
| Release | November 2 2010 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #770 | #773 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















