GeForce GTX 660M vs Quadro 4000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 660M vs Quadro 4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 660M vs Quadro 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 660M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 142W, a 92W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).

Quadro 4000

2010

Why buy it

✅107.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌184% higher power demand at 142W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 107.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,475 vs 1,452), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 660M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 4000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 4000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 660M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 660M vs Quadro 4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 660M

The GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 835 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points.

Quadro 4000

The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 660M scores 1,452 and the Quadro 4000 reaches 1,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660M is built on Kepler while the Quadro 4000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 256 (Quadro 4000). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Quadro 4000
G3D Mark Score	1,452	1,475+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+50%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS+50%	0.4864 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	32 KB	512 KB+1500%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 660M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 4000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Quadro 4000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 660M and 64-bit on the Quadro 4000. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 512 KB (Quadro 4000) — the Quadro 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Quadro 4000
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 660M draws 50W versus the Quadro 4000's 142W — a 95.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 350W (Quadro 4000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Quadro 4000
TDP	50W-65%	142W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	29.0+179%	10.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 660M (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Quadro 4000
MSRP	—	$1199
Codename	GK107	GF100
Release	March 22 2012	November 2 2010
Ranking	#774	#770

Search GeForce GTX 660M on Amazon

Search Quadro 4000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.