GeForce GTX 660M
VS
Quadro 4000

GeForce GTX 660M vs Quadro 4000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660M

2012Core: 835 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 4000

2010Core: 475 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 660M is positioned at rank 190 and the Quadro 4000 is on rank 339, so the GeForce GTX 660M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 660M

#180
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
374%
#182
339%
#183
338%
#187
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
307%
#188
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
305%
#190
GeForce GTX 660M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
97%
#197
96%
#203
GeForce GT 730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
85%
#324
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
12011%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
100%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
95%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
93%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
88%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
87%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
86%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
85%
#347
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
84%
#348
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
84%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
80%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
79%
#352
FirePro 2270
MSRP: $149|Avg: $30
77%
#353
FirePro 2460
MSRP: $180|Avg: $10
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 660M.

InsightGeForce GTX 660MQuadro 4000
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 660M and Quadro 4000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660M

The GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 835 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 4000

The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 660M scores 1,452 and the Quadro 4000 reaches 1,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660M is built on Kepler while the Quadro 4000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 256 (Quadro 4000). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 660MQuadro 4000
G3D Mark Score
1,452
1,475+2%
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+50%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS+50%
0.4864 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
512 KB+1500%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 660MQuadro 4000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 512 KB (Quadro 4000) — the Quadro 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660MQuadro 4000
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 660M draws 50W versus the Quadro 4000's 142W — a 95.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 350W (Quadro 4000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660MQuadro 4000
TDP
50W-65%
142W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
60°C
Perf/Watt
29.0+179%
10.4
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 660M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 660MQuadro 4000
MSRP
$1199
Avg Price (30d)
$30
Codename
GK107
GF100
Release
March 22 2012
November 2 2010
Ranking
#774
#770